It was never suggested that the interface be Serializable. The field can
use an implementation that's Serializable.
Thanks,
Sahoo
Jon Miller wrote:
> IMHO, it should be OK to use the List interface as long as it points
> to a class that implements Serializable. i.e. List<String> property =
> ArrayList<String>(); should work. Why should the interface have to be
> serializable? I don't like the idea of having to hard code it to a
> concrete type.
>
> Jon