Hi Marina,
I'm curious about the version policy, indeed.
persistence-api:
What does it mean by "1.0b"? does "b" mean a patch version?
toplink-essentials:
Does TopLink Essentials have unique version policy (2.0?) other than SJSAS
version (9.1)?
Manifest has version like "9.1 build: b35". Also I don't think trunk build
has 2.0 changes (if 9.0 build is 1.0). Then should it be 1.1? I'm not sure.
I believe that version policy is important because ugly version scheme could
confuse users/developers and it would not be easy to change it later.
Also I have following questions in my mind.
- Could TopLink Essentials be independent project (separation from GlassFish
like Grizzly) in the future?
- Does TopLink Essentials require unique version policy than SJSAS version(
9.0, 9.1)?
- If not, should the SJSAS version be used for maven repository?
Regards,
-Wonseok
On 2/9/07, Marina Vatkina <Marina.Vatkina_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> I made the following changes to create jars with a new version:
>
> 1. Changed version of the persistence-api related files to 1.0b in
> persistence-api:
> Index: build.properties
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/glassfish/persistence-api/build.properties,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -r1.4 build.properties
> 29c29
> < release.version=1.0
> ---
> > release.version=1.0b
>
> 2. Changed version of the toplink related files to 2.0-35 and the
> dependency on
> the p-api to 1.0b in entity-persistence:
>
> Index: build.properties
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/glassfish/entity-persistence/build.properties,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -r1.2 build.properties
> 29c29
> < release.version=1.0
> ---
> > release.version=2.0-35
> Index: toplink-essentials.pom
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/glassfish/entity-persistence/toplink-essentials.pom,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -r1.1 toplink-essentials.pom
> 10c10
> < <version>1.0</version>
> ---
> > <version>1.0b</version>
>
> I tested by creating the files without pushing them to the repository.
> Their
> names look correct:
>
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/jars/persistence-
> api-1.0b.jar
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/jars/persistence-
> api-1.0b.jar.md5
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/poms/persistence-
> api-1.0b.pom
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/poms/persistence-
> api-1.0b.pom.md5
>
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/java-sources/persistence-
> api-1.0b-sources.jar
>
> persistence-api/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/java-sources/persistence-
> api-1.0b-sources.jar.md5
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/jars/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35.jar
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/jars/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35.jar.md5
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/poms/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35.pom
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/poms/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35.pom.md5
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/java-sources/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35-sources.jar
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/javax.persistence/java-sources/toplink-
> essentials-2.0-35-sources.jar.md5
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/jars/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35.jar
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/jars/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35.jar.md5
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/poms/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35.pom
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/poms/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35.pom.md5
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/java-sources/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35-sources.jar
>
> entity-persistence/build/maven-repo/oracle.toplink.essentials.agent/java-sources/toplink-
> essentials-agent-2.0-35-sources.jar.md5
>
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
>