persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: Code review for: [Issue 1107] Logger defined by a property doesn't work]

From: Tom Ware <tom.ware_at_oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:52:42 -0400

I am ok with changing the default, and with removing the code that sets
the logging level to the default if it makes sense. I think we need to
figure deal with the namespace issue before we settle on exactly how
this will all work.

-Tom

Marina Vatkina wrote:

>Great! I'll remove the API and the check for the TopLink defaults
>(Tom, are you sure, you don't need this option?).
>
>thanks,
>-marina
>
>Wonseok Kim wrote:
>
>
>>Marina,
>>
>>On 10/13/06, *Marina Vatkina* <Marina.Vatkina_at_sun.com
>><mailto:Marina.Vatkina_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Tom, about the new useParentLevel() - will it be OFF or INFO by default,
>> if you don't specify the level in SE? Can you check?
>>
>>
>>For DefaultSessionLog it's already setting level as INFO by default like
>>below.
>>
>> public DefaultSessionLog() {
>> super();
>> this.level = INFO;
>> }
>>
>>For JavaLog, it will follow the JRE environment or user-specified
>>logging.properties. JRE default is INFO.
>>
>>- Wonseok
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Tom Ware
Principal Software Engineer
Oracle Canada Inc.
Direct: (613) 783-4598
Email: tom.ware_at_oracle.com