Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying that you have made a conscious decision to
> annotate RegistryObject as a MappedSuperclass. A MappedSuperclass can't
> be target of a relationship, but your object model have such
> relationships. It should have been an Abstract Entity class, but then
> your relational schema can't be changed and TopLink Essential does not
> support TABLE_PER_CLASS strategy. So, I can't think of a solution right
> now. Without such constraints, I would have coded like this (it answers
> your question about PropertyPK class):
>
...
Thanks again Sahoo for the very clear answers.
Any answer to my question below?
The answer will determine how I deal with above
problem.
Thanks.
>>
>> BTW any guess as to when InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS will be
>> supported?
...
--
Regards,
Farrukh
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com