We can soften the language if you like. We probably need an issue for
that. It looks like the user has the warning despite not explicitly
specifying that property. We should also look into that. Both can
probably be covered by the same issue.
-Tom
Marina Vatkina wrote:
>Tom, Peter,
>
>Let's change the waring about obsolete names to be something less
>drastic (see http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=17531&tstart=0).
>
>Do we need an issue for that?
>
>thanks,
>-marina
>
>