persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: EJB3 EJB2.1 ?

From: Hale India <hale_india_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 05:31:42 -0800 (PST)

Hi Sanjeeb

Thank's for you help.

I will follow the link.

Andre

--- Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
>
> Hale India wrote:
>
> >Hi Sanjeeb
> >
> >Thank you for this information.
> >When you say that they work together you mean :
> >
> >
> I meant GlassFish runs with mustang. Answers in
> line...
>
> >1) Glassfish can be compile with mustang ?
> >
> >
> I have never tried compiling with Mustang. I will
> check with our release
> engineers to see if they have built using Mustang or
> not. AFAIK, there
> is no language level change in Mustang. So I will be
> surprised, if it
> does not compile. By the way, do you plan to compile
> GlassFish sources
> or you want to use the GlassFish binary?
>
> >2) WS made using embeded JAX-WS in mustang can be
> >deployed in Glassfish compile with mustang ?
> >
> >
>
> The WS program that you write for Mustang has two
> parts, viz: a) the end
> point, b) the the driver class which starts the
> embedded web server and
> publishes the end point. The second part is neither
> useful nor required
> in GlassFish. Only the first part is useful. You
> take the end point
> implementation, package it as a war and deploy it in
> GlassFish. It gets
> deployed as a servlet based end point. I could do
> this a for a simple
> web service.
>
> Is this what you are looking for? Then answer is
> yes. BTW, I am not good
> at web services, so I could be wrong. So I recommend
> you ask your web
> service related issues at our forum:
> http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=56
>
> >2) WS made using embedded JAX-WS in mustang can be
> >deployed in Glassfish compile with java 1.5 ?
> >
> >
> Same as answer #2.
>
> >3) clients made with mustang can use WS of any
> >Glassfish ?
> >
> >
> I am not clear as to what you are asking here.
>
> >Excuse all these question, but a start a new
> release
> >of our project to be deliver end of this year) and
> I
> >try to define what to use to start.
> >
> You are most welcome. Please ask your questions in
> our forum at
> http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=56
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> > We move to EBJ3.0
> >it is the only thing decided by today ...
> >
> >Thank's
> >
> >Andre
> >--- Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Marina Vatkina wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi Andre,
> >>>
> >>>If you look here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/ServerModules.html
> >
> >
> >>you will
> >>
> >>
> >>>see that GlassFish supports both, EJB2.1 and EJB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>3.0.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Current version of GlassFish works with JDK 1.5.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>It will work with
> >>
> >>
> >>>Mustang in the future.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Even today, GlassFish works with Mustang. No
> change,
> >>what so ever.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Sahoo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>regards,
> >>>-marina
> >>>
> >>>Hale India wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi
> >>>>
> >>>>If we look at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>https://glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/javaee5/docs/DG/beahl.html
> >
> >
> >>>>Glassfish support EJB2.1
> >>>>
> >>>>If we look at :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
>https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/entity-persistence-support.html#getting_started
> >
> >
> >>>>Glassfish persistence is done by EJB3 and
> connect
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>us to the link :
> >>
> >>
> >>>>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=220
> >>>>
> >>>>I would like to understand better and for this I
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>need a clear answer
> >>
> >>
> >>>>EJB2.1 ? EJB3.0 ? both ?
> >>>>
> >>>>I see also in JAVA mustang new support for JDBC
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>where database
> >>
> >>
> >>>>provide service , and where JAVA mustang offer
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>native support for
> >>
> >>
> >>>>JAX-WS 2.0
> >>>>I ask myself how Glassfish will be connected to
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>mustang, will we need
> >>
> >>
> >>>>to wait for a new glassfish release to get
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>support for mustang ?
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Are they designed to work together ?
> >>>>
> >>>>Any answer welcome
> >>>>
> >>>>Best regards
>
=== message truncated ===