persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: EJB3 EJB2.1 ?

From: Hale India <hale_india_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:04:34 -0800 (PST)

Hi Sanjeeb

Thank you for this information.
When you say that they work together you mean :
1) Glassfish can be compile with mustang ?
2) WS made using embeded JAX-WS in mustang can be
deployed in Glassfish compile with mustang ?
2) WS made using embedded JAX-WS in mustang can be
deployed in Glassfish compile with java 1.5 ?
3) clients made with mustang can use WS of any
Glassfish ?

Excuse all these question, but a start a new release
of our project to be deliver end of this year) and I
try to define what to use to start. We move to EBJ3.0
it is the only thing decided by today ...

Thank's

Andre
--- Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM> wrote:

> Marina Vatkina wrote:
>
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > If you look here:
> >
>
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/ServerModules.html
> you will
> > see that GlassFish supports both, EJB2.1 and EJB
> 3.0.
> >
> > Current version of GlassFish works with JDK 1.5.
> It will work with
> > Mustang in the future.
>
> Even today, GlassFish works with Mustang. No change,
> what so ever.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> >
> > regards,
> > -marina
> >
> > Hale India wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> If we look at
> >>
> >>
>
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/javaee5/docs/DG/beahl.html
> >>
> >> Glassfish support EJB2.1
> >>
> >> If we look at :
> >>
>
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/entity-persistence-support.html#getting_started
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Glassfish persistence is done by EJB3 and connect
> us to the link :
> >> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=220
> >>
> >> I would like to understand better and for this I
> need a clear answer
> >> EJB2.1 ? EJB3.0 ? both ?
> >>
> >> I see also in JAVA mustang new support for JDBC
> where database
> >> provide service , and where JAVA mustang offer
> native support for
> >> JAX-WS 2.0
> >> I ask myself how Glassfish will be connected to
> mustang, will we need
> >> to wait for a new glassfish release to get
> support for mustang ?
> >> Are they designed to work together ?
> >>
> >> Any answer welcome
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Andre Legendre
> >
>
>