From: Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:24:35 -0800

Hi,

I'd suggest waiting to hear from the spec lead(s) before doing
anything with this bug report. I understand that this is a spec bug.

Craig

On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Marina Vatkina wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> Isn't the spec requirement wrong? While it might be
> tricky to update version column of all tables, if
> bulk update doesn't do it, any parallel tx can override the changes.
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mb124283_at_dev.java.net
> Date: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:11 am
> Subject: [Issue 154] New - EJBQL: bulk UPDATE statement should not
> update version columns
>
>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=154
>> Issue #|154
>> Summary|EJBQL: bulk UPDATE statement should not
>> update version
>> | columns
>> Component|glassfish
>> Version|9.0pe
>> Platform|All
>> OS/Version|All
>> URL|
>> Status|NEW
>> Status whiteboard|
>> Keywords|
>> Resolution|
>> Issue type|TASK
>> Priority|P3
>> Subcomponent|entity-persistence
>> Assigned to|tware
>> Reported by|mb124283
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional comments from mb124283_at_dev.java.net Fri Jan 13
>> 19:11:47 +0000 2006 -------
>> The PFD version of the EJB3 persistence spec clarifies that an
>> EJBQL bulk UPDATE
>> statement does not update version columns.
>>
>> Today the EJBQL query
>> UPDATE Customer c SET c.name = 'CHANGED'
>> is mapped to the following SQL:
>> UPDATE CMP3_CUSTOMER
>> SET NAME = 'CHANGED', CUST_VERSION = (CUST_VERSION + 1)
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell_at_sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!