Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote:
> Shelly (Donna) McGowan wrote:
>
> >Sahoo,
> >
> >Sure. I can do this today.
> >
> >Just to confirm,
> >
> >- no longer need to specify provider (in-container)
> >- application.xml is no longer required
> >- jta-datasource and non-jta-datasource do not co-exist
> >- name element is required
> >
> >
> Yes, you are correct in all the items.
Sahoo, the latest proposal removed jta-datasource and
non-jta-datasource restriction. Does the current code
work differently?
thanks,
-marina
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> >Shelly
> >
> >
> >
> >Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote On 10/24/05 04:18,:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Shelly,
> >> glassfish now supports packaging of JSR 220 entity beans in jar/war
> >>files. Would you mind upgrading CTS tests to use the new packaging
> >>format? At this point, I would suggest making just the necessary
> >>changes, i.e. update the persistence.xml to new schema and change file
> >>extension from par to jar. Let's not bundle the driver in a war file to
> >>start with, let them be in an ejb-jar. Is it possible to test these
> >>changes first? Once this works, we will change TopLink Essentials to use
> >>the new SPIs. We are not changing TopLink Essentials at this point
> >>because we want to do these changes in steps.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Sahoo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >