persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: packaging withour .par

From: Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:56:08 +0530

Shelly (Donna) McGowan wrote:

>Sahoo,
>
>Sure. I can do this today.
>
>Just to confirm,
>
>- no longer need to specify provider (in-container)
>- application.xml is no longer required
>- jta-datasource and non-jta-datasource do not co-exist
>- name element is required
>
>
Yes, you are correct in all the items.
Thanks,
Sahoo

>Shelly
>
>
>
>Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote On 10/24/05 04:18,:
>
>
>>Hi Shelly,
>> glassfish now supports packaging of JSR 220 entity beans in jar/war
>>files. Would you mind upgrading CTS tests to use the new packaging
>>format? At this point, I would suggest making just the necessary
>>changes, i.e. update the persistence.xml to new schema and change file
>>extension from par to jar. Let's not bundle the driver in a war file to
>>start with, let them be in an ejb-jar. Is it possible to test these
>>changes first? Once this works, we will change TopLink Essentials to use
>>the new SPIs. We are not changing TopLink Essentials at this point
>>because we want to do these changes in steps.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sahoo
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>