On Friday 12 October 2012 12:32 PM, Lukas Jungmann wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 08:47 AM, Sahoo wrote:
>> Actually, there is a problem, but I am not sure how we can fix this now.
>>
>> 2.3-b55 is actually greater than 2.3-b100 as far as maven version is
>> concerned. So, effectively you are doing a downgrade. I don't know if it
>> matters anywhere since we don't really use version ranges. Just wait.
>
> ok, change reverted
>
I think it will be safer to start a new qualifier series to make sure
that version is properly sorted. Something like 2.3-c01 instead of
2.3-b100. Wait for Romain to comment.
We use bXX in glassfish, because we promote once a week and assumed a
release to not take more than 99 weeks. Looks like the assumption may
not hold good for GF 4.0 itself, so we have to fix it for GF 4.0 at some
point. May we should use 3 digits for build numbers starting from next
release.
Thanks for reverting,
Sahoo