dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: pom change review - jersey 1.11-b02 integration

From: Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:41:56 -0800

Just a general process question. Do we really need to have pom reviews
for simple version bumps? I can can understand reviews for more complex
build changes, but this seems to be overkill....



On 11/28/11 10:27 AM, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> Looks fine...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Snjezana
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pavel.bucek_at_oracle.com
> To: dev_at_glassfish.java.net
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:27:43 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: Re: pom change review - jersey 1.11-b02 integration
>
> bump
>
> On 11/25/11 10:47 AM, Pavel Bucek wrote:
>> *trunk* + *3.1.2* branch
>>
>> Index: pom.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- pom.xml (revision 51133)
>> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
>> <javadb.version>10.6.2.1</javadb.version>
>> <jaxr.version>JAXR_RA_20091012</jaxr.version>
>> <weld.version>1.1.3.SP1</weld.version>
>> -<jersey.version>1.11-b01</jersey.version>
>> +<jersey.version>1.11-b02</jersey.version>
>> <jbi.version>1.0</jbi.version>
>> <wsdl4j.version>1.6.2</wsdl4j.version>
>>
>> <glassfish-management-api.version>3.1.0-b001</glassfish-management-api.version>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
>>