Tim Quinn wrote on 03/24/10 07:06 AM:
> At least some of the check-ins in 2010 were the rollback of earlier
> changes made in 2010 to the files' 2009 states. So the resulting state
> of the source is as it was in 2009 even though the latest action on the
> file was in 2010. I would think that the copyright for such a file
> should remain 2009 since the code in such a file has not been changed in
> 2010.
>
> I guess the script that generated this list does not account for that
> case so we have some false positives here?
There's no way the script can know that. It only knows when the file
was last changed in svn. If you can think of a way the script can figure
that out, let me know. Otherwise, please update the dates to 2010 so
the script can continue to check for errors.