On Jun 18, 2009, at 9:54 PM, vince kraemer wrote:
> Jane Young wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Lacking a technical solution, we need to make sure that all GFv3
>>> users of gmbal are represented on the gmbal email alias
>>> (dev_at_gmbal.kenai.com seems best at this point) so that we can at
>>> least co-ordinate the announcement of new releases,
>>> and make sure everyone knows when a new release is available, and
>>> is being included into GFv3.
>>>
>> I don't think it's a good idea to ask all GFv3 user to be on the
>> gmbal e-mail alias. There's already a lot of e-mails going around
>> plus how would that solve the issue with identifying the gmbal
>> version used in webservices. I feel it's webservices team to make
>> sure that the version they are integrating to v3 workspace aligns
>> with the gmbal version used in GFv3.
>
> I think Ken was saying that he thinks all the gmbal users that also
> use and/or develop GF should register for the dev_at_gmbal.kenai.com
> mailing list...
Yes, that's what I meant. It's simply that if more and more people
that own external modules (not in the main GFv3 repo)
start using gmbal, we need to be careful to avoid problems like we've
been seeing. The only way to do that
is to make sure we are all using the same Gmbal version (based on the
problems we've seen in this area).
But I thought OSGi was supposed to allow different modules to use
different versions of the same module,
so long as the module being used is entirely private. I don't know
why we are having these problems.
>
>
> I am pretty sure he was not recommending that all the folks on the users_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> mailing list get subscribed to the dev_at_gmbal.kenai.com mailing
> list...
Certainly not! Not everyone that users/develops/works with GF has any
interest in Gmbal.
Ken.
>
>
> Or, maybe not...
>
> vbk
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>