On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:18:05PM -0700, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> I was just about to ask whether that would help, Jersey was also interested
> in this...
We simply asked jaxb to be provided as a standalone IPS package, so that
we do not need to depend on the whole metro IPS package, when we need only jaxb jar.
>
> We could also move jaxb to glassfish-common package which would make it
> available in both web and full distributions...
I still do not understand, why we need to hide certain osgi modules
in ips packages with different names (jaxb in metro, now jaxb in glassfish-something,
jettison in jersey, asm in glassfish-something, ...),
as it IMHO only confuses people and causes situations like we have now.
Why it is not possible to have a.jar provided by a.ips-module?
It should simplify things and make them transparent for everybody.
~Jakub
>
> Thanks,
>
> Snjezana
>
> Bhakti Mehta wrote:
>
>> Maybe one solution is just remove jaxb from metro package and create a new
>> package for jaxb and let jaxb be available for web distribution?
>> Regards,
>> Bhakti
>>
>> Ed Burns wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:57:12 -0700, Jerome Dochez
>>>>>>>> <Jerome.Dochez_at_Sun.COM> said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> JD> I am not sure I understand what the initial problem is.
>>> JD> first you seem to suggest we just need to modify the felix.properties
>>> JD> and then you want to add a bundles (with what content exactly ?) to
>>> JD> the web distribution only.
>>>
>>> JD> are u trying to override the JAXB APis from the JDK to run BV ?
>>>
>>> JD> could you clarify ?
>>>
>>> Of course, but this is why I wanted a voice meeting.
>>>
>>> The problem is that JSR-303 version 1.0 CR2 now has dependencies on
>>> javax.xml.bind and javax.xml.bind.annotation. The current configuration
>>> for the web distribution does not expose these packages via OSGi. However
>>> you want to fix that problem is fine with me, but we need to
>>> decide fast because JSR-303 version 1.0 CR2 has binary contract changes
>>> that impact JSF 2.0, which also needs to be in by the 4 May deadline.
>>>
>>> Does that help?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>