dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: QL failure.

From: Jane Young <Jane.Young_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:26:49 -0700

Is it possible to run this test manually on Windows and check the
server.log? The stacktrace from QL does not tell me anything.
Sherry/Ming can you send the instructions on executing this test?
Byron/Nandini, can you run this test manually and check server.log?

Jane


Nandini Ektare wrote:
> Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>> The difference, as I mentioned earlier, is that your build was
>> produced on your Windows system, whereas the one you picked up from
>> Hudson was built on either Solaris or Linux...
>>
>> Can we go back from those failed tests and see if there is anything
>> that could be platform sensitive at build time?
> For easy reference here is the failed test trace:
>
> [testng] FAILED: helloRemote
> [testng] javax.naming.NoInitialContextException: Need to specify class
> name in environment or system property, or as
> applet parameter, or in an application resource file:
> java.naming.factory.initial
> [testng] at
> javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:645)
> [testng] at
> javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:288)
> [testng] at
> javax.naming.InitialContext.getURLOrDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:325)
>
> [testng] at
> javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
> [testng] at
> test.ejb.remoteview.RemoteViewTestNG.helloRemote(RemoteViewTestNG.java:18)
>
> [testng] ... Removed 22 stack frames
> [testng] SKIPPED: nonPortableGlobal
> [testng] SKIPPED: portableGlobal
>
> [testng] ===============================================
> [testng] ejb_remoteview
> [testng] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Skips: 2
> [testng] ===============================================
>
>> Nandini Ektare wrote:
>>
>>> Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ming, this is passing for me...
>>>>
>>>> Now, sorry to offload this but I do have something rather urgent to
>>>> take care of - could someone who experienced QL failure on their
>>>> Windows system take glassfish.zip file produced by continuous build?
>>>
>>> I ran QL successfully against the continuous build Snjezana had
>>> referenced
>>> (http://gf-hudson.sfbay.sun.com/hudson/job/gf-trunk-build-continuous/ )
>>> That passes without any failures.
>>>
>>> But the zip coming out of the trunk's build has this error. What is
>>> the difference between the two (if any)?
>>>
>>> Nandini
>>>
>>>> This is still "developer" distribution, but the difference is that
>>>> it is built on Unix as opposed to Windows which may make difference
>>>> when it comes to things such as EOL characters and such...
>>>>
>>>> Ming Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Snjezana,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just for the debug purpose, can you/or someone try QL against the
>>>>> IPS build on windows also?
>>>>> http://gf-hudson.sfbay/hudson/job/trunk-nightly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/bundles/glassfish-v3-b48-05_20_2009.zip
>>>>>
>>>>> So that we are on the same page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ming
>>>>>
>>>>> Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that the development build now differs from IPS build only
>>>>>> in the presence of IPS metadata, this is *very* slim possibility....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ming Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But continuous QL job is running on solaris/linux, right? I
>>>>>>> suspect the development build on windows has problem.
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ming
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it couldn't because continuous QL job itself is running on
>>>>>>>> non-IPS distributions...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ming Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Byron brought up the failures 2 days ago. I tried to reproduce
>>>>>>>>> the QL failures with glassfish-v3-b48-05_18_2009.zip on my
>>>>>>>>> Windows Vista and couldn't see the errors. Today I used
>>>>>>>>> glassfish-v3-b48-05_20_2009.zip (trunk nightly) and still all
>>>>>>>>> QL tests passed. Could this be due to IPS vs development build?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Mings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Byron Nevins wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I'm not positive but it looks just right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It was "ejb-something", 1 failure, 2 skips
>>>>>>>>>> over and over again
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Marina Vatkina wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Byron,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are these the same failures that you saw?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> -marina
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nandini Ektare wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dies.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jane, even I use windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Nandini
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dies Koper wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Nandini, Jane,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been seeing the same failure during QL for two days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's on Windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jane Young wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure what's going on with your build.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just did a "mvn clean install" on v3 trunk workspace
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have no problem running QL tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using a Mac.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nandini Ektare wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jane Young wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QL tests are passing on Hudson' v3 trunk continuous build.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hudson.glassfish.org/job/gf-trunk-build-continuous/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you compile with "mvn clean install" to make sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your build is from a clean target workspace and try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running QL again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm...I removed maven repo and did a mvn -U clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install. I still get this error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any new additional System property that needs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be configured. The error seems to suggest that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nandini Ektare wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With a latest fresh checkout of v3 trunk I see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following issue. Is this a known issue ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] FAILED: helloRemote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] javax.naming.NoInitialContextException: Need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to specify class name in environment or system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> property, or as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applet parameter, or in an application resource file:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.naming.factory.initial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:645)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:288)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javax.naming.InitialContext.getURLOrDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:325)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.ejb.remoteview.RemoteViewTestNG.helloRemote(RemoteViewTestNG.java:18)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] ... Removed 22 stack frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] SKIPPED: nonPortableGlobal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] SKIPPED: portableGlobal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] ===============================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] ejb_remoteview
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Skips: 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [testng] ===============================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Nandini
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>