OK, I'll get it moved to glassfish-common then. Ed, to answer your
previous question, this should make it to today's nightly...
Thanks,
Snjezana
Jerome Dochez wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
>
>> So, is it OK to move JAXB to glassfish-common (or glassfish-nucleus,
>> if we need to have it in nucleus distribution, too) package instead
>> of creating whole new dedicated package?
>
> no it should not go in nucleus, just in web distribution.
> you can reuse existing modules that ship with web distribution to
> avoid creating more modules.
>
> jerome
>
>>
>> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>
>>> it's me. That sounds like the right solution.
>>>
>>> jerome
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:13:07 -0700, Bhakti Mehta
>>>>>>>>> <Bhakti.Mehta_at_Sun.COM > said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BM> Maybe one solution is just remove jaxb from metro package and
>>>> create a
>>>> BM> new package for jaxb and let jaxb be available for web
>>>> distribution?
>>>>
>>>> That sounds good. Who is the decider here?
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>