On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic wrote:
> So, is it OK to move JAXB to glassfish-common (or glassfish-nucleus,
> if we need to have it in nucleus distribution, too) package instead
> of creating whole new dedicated package?
no it should not go in nucleus, just in web distribution.
you can reuse existing modules that ship with web distribution to
avoid creating more modules.
jerome
>
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>
>> it's me. That sounds like the right solution.
>>
>> jerome
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Ed Burns wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:13:07 -0700, Bhakti Mehta <Bhakti.Mehta_at_Sun.COM
>>>>>>>> > said:
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> BM> Maybe one solution is just remove jaxb from metro package and
>>> create a
>>> BM> new package for jaxb and let jaxb be available for web
>>> distribution?
>>>
>>> That sounds good. Who is the decider here?
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>