Why are we still wrapping eclipselink?
Thanks,
Sahoo
Mitesh Meswani wrote:
> Jane, Sahoo, Jerome,
>
> Can you please review following pom.xml changes to upgrade to
> EclipseLink 2.0.0-M2.1
>
> Please note that I have moved property eclipselink.version to top
> level pom to keep it close to corresponding javax-persitence-api.veresion
>
> % svn diff pom.xml
> Index: pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- pom.xml (revision 26624)
> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
> @@ -144,7 +144,8 @@
> <ucbootstrap.version>0.0.0.15</ucbootstrap.version>
> <webservices.version>2.0-b09</webservices.version>
> <jaxb.version>2.2-promoted-b17</jaxb.version>
> -
> <javax-persistence-api.version>2.0.0-M1</javax-persistence-api.version>
> +
> <javax-persistence-api.version>2.0.0-M2.1</javax-persistence-api.version>
> + <eclipselink.version>2.0.0-M2.1</eclipselink.version>
> <dbschema.version>RELEASE60</dbschema.version>
> <!-- osgi version string must start with a number. Manually
> mapping above dbschema.version to osgi.version here
> -->
> <dbschema.osgi.version>6.0</dbschema.osgi.version>
> % svn diff persistence/eclipselink-wrapper/pom.xml
> Index: persistence/eclipselink-wrapper/pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- persistence/eclipselink-wrapper/pom.xml (revision 26624)
> +++ persistence/eclipselink-wrapper/pom.xml (working copy)
> @@ -47,9 +47,6 @@
> <artifactId>eclipselink-wrapper</artifactId>
> <packaging>pom</packaging>
> <name>Repackaging of EclipseLink as a module</name>
> - <properties>
> - <eclipselink.version>2.0.0-M1</eclipselink.version>
> - </properties>
> <developers>
> <developer>
> <id>mm110999</id>
>
> Thanks,
> Mitesh
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>