Dies,
Memory fails me here, but I think the change-set you sent a pointer
to, refers to building the source with JDK 6 (or so says the checkin
log: "Checking in changes for JDK6 compilation").
I am not sure why it was attempted as GF v2 needs to run with Java 5
and compiling it with Java 6 to create classes targeted for
Java 5 does not look necessary. From a cursory glance, all of the
changes are related to building/compilation.
Sorry, I don't know the context here and I think this does not need
to be forward ported to 2.1.next.
-Kedar
Dies Koper wrote:
> Hi Kedar,
>
> I just sent the e-mail below to Dinesh Patil but noticed he hasn't been
> active on the GF mailing lists for quite a while.
>
> He made a change to GFv2UR1 that later was NOT included in GFv2.1.
> It looks like a mistake to me, but I'd like to make sure. (If it was,
> maybe it should be considered for inclusion in GFv2.1-next?)
>
> http://fisheye5.cenqua.com/changelog/glassfish/appserv-jstl?cs=SJSAS91_UR1_BRANCH:dpatil:20080206022354
>
> You are the project owner of the first few files he changed, so I
> thought I'd ask you first.
>
> Thanks,
> Dies
>
>
> Dies Koper wrote:
>> Hi Dinesh,
>>
>> In GFv2UR1 you made the following changes to help GlassFish compile on JDK6.
>>
>> http://fisheye5.cenqua.com/changelog/glassfish/appserv-jstl?cs=SJSAS91_UR1_BRANCH:dpatil:20080206022354
>>
>> In GFv2.1 these changes seem to be not included. Do you know the reason why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dies Koper
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>