Yes. I will upgrade to the latest version.
I hope no regressions with that. Last time, we had to change some of the
options to the FindBugs command that we were using in the scripts.
Thanks.
-- Jagadesh
Vince Kraemer wrote:
> we are running a very old version of FindBugs to generate the report
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/quality/v3/fb-developer-report.html?
>
> the report is generated using FB 1.2.1 (released 2007-05-31).
>
> the current version is 1.3.7 (released 2008-12-30).
>
> The next version (1.3.8) is had its RC2 release on 2009-03-03.
>
> See:
> https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=96405&package_id=103029
>
>
> I bet that we would end up with fewer false positives if we upgraded....
>
> vbk
>
> Vince Kraemer wrote:
>> that there is a job that automatically checks our v3 code with
>> FindBugs every day for high priority issues?
>> *https://glassfish.dev.java.net/quality/v3/fb-developer-report.html
>>
>> *Did you know that we have been keeping clean for quite some time?
>> You can see the history of the file here:
>> http://fisheye5.atlassian.com/browse/glassfish/www/quality/v3/fb-developer-report.html
>>
>>
>> So, should we 'double down' and start getting a report that includes
>> High and Medium priority issues generated?
>>
>> You can go here to see a list of the bugs FindBugs finds here:
>> http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/bugDescriptions.html
>>
>> vbk
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>