dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: GlassfFish Authentication\Authorization

From: Michael Hardy <hardymf_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:15:09 -0600

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Michael Hardy <hardymf_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Kumar,
> Thank you for your kind attention to this issue. Both of the links below
> relate to secuity for messaging. Since we do not as yet have a Messaging
> Bean (MB) and do not currently utilize JMS in our application, this is not
> related to the issue. To describe what the needs are further, we have an
> Enterprise Application with CRUD and an Oracle DB backend. We deploy to
> GlassFish with a single ear file and have form-based authentication at the
> front end with users, roles etc. maintained in the DB. Using JAAS required
> that we create a realm and the concommitant dependency upon a connection
> pool and a datasource. The application functions as expected and we can
> allow\disallow funtionality presented to the client based upon the users
> role. We have implemented a portion of our functionality as a web service.
> This service, when deployed to the GlassFish container is available to local
> services seamlessly. When needed by a remote service, the forms-based
> authentication is problematic as the client application does not have the
> capability to respond to a login prompt presented by the form. When we
> modify the web.xml and switch from FORM to BASIC auth-method, the remote
> access by a client application to the web service works, but our web site
> loses the login form at the front end and now presents the standard
> browser-based login dialog. We hope to maintain our current form-based
> login and utilize either BASIC or, better yet, CLIENT-CERT
> authentication\authorization of a web service in a single deployment of an
> Enterprise Application.
> Thank You,
> -Michael
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:34 AM, V B Kumar Jayanti <
> Vbkumar.Jayanti_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Hardy wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>> We currently use JAAS and db stored groups and users to manage a
>>> form-based login. We would also like to have the same level of
>>> authentication\authorization security on a web service we have created.
>>> Since the consumer of the web service is a client device, we do not wish to
>>> use the form authorization\authentication method. We have verified that
>>> using BASIC authentication the conversation between device and web service
>>> functions perfectly. However, this of course precludes our form-based login
>>> for the web site in our enterprise application. Is there a strategy for
>>> mixed BASIC and FORM authentication? Even better might be a mixed FORM (web
>>> site login authentication and authorization) and CLIENT-CERT model.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure if we understood the requirement very well, but if you have a
>> Web App with Form Login and another WebService, can they not be two
>> separate deployable modules ?.
>> Based on what we understood so far, One thing that you can explore is the
>> possibility of using a Server Auth Module (SAM) .
>>
>> http://blogs.sun.com/enterprisetechtips/entry/adding_authentication_mechanisms_to_the
>>
>> http://blogs.sun.com/monzillo/entry/pluggable_authentication_in_the_glassfish.
>>
>>
>> We were wondering how you would disthinguish between when to use FORM and
>> when to use BASIC auth in your current design. May be i should wait for
>> some clarification from your side, before suggesting anything more.
>>
>> regards,
>> kumar
>>
>> Thank You,
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>