Hong,
Since in V3 all applications are under <applications>, to make sure I
understand:
- deploy hello.war
- deploy hello.ear => error, name conflict
Correct?
Lloyd
On May 19, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Hong Zhang wrote:
> Hi, Arun
>
>>> first of all, Arun is slightly obsolete :
>>
>> It's weird that we have obsolete commands in v3 ;-) I think there
>> should be a separate section that lists such commands.
>
> I believe this is documented in the cli commands man page. And if
> you try to use deploydir command to deploy in v3, you will see a
> message telling you this command is deprecated:
>
> hzhang_at_nmr:~$ ~/files/sun/glassfish/bin/asadmin deploydir ~/
> deployment/apps/hello
> WARNING : deploydir command deprecated. Please use deploy command
> instead.
> Command deploydir executed successfully.
>
> This command will be removed in the next release after v3 (backward
> compatibility rule, deprecated in one release and removed in the
> next).
>
>>> now if the current directory contains a hello.war, a hello.ear and
>>> a hello subdirectory, I am not sure that a system choosing the
>>> "right" file based on an ordering rule that nobody will know is an
>>> advantage. Also considering that most shell do file completion,
>>> it's not that much typing after doing a TAB.
>>
>> It's still inconsistent to me. Using the same command to undeploy
>> whether EAR or WAR sounds still weird, YMMV.
>
> There is no ambiguity in undeploying the application. The ear, war
> and other module types share the same name space in server
> implementation, so there can only be one application with the
> registration name "hello" at one time.
>
>
> - Hong
>
>>
>>
>>> vince kraemer wrote:
>>>
>>>> That sounds like a great CLI enhancement, to me.
>>>>
>>>> I hate to type. I love it when a tool "does the right thing",
>>>> even if I make a bit of a mistake.
>>>>
>>>> vbk
>>>>
>>>> Arun Gupta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I don't exactly understand the question you are asking in this
>>>>>> e-mail...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you are asking for something like this...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the user enters 'asadmin deploy hello', then the operand
>>>>>> will be used as the "root" of a matching scheme...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The deploy command would search to see if there was a hello.war
>>>>>> or hello.ear or hello.jar or a directory named hello... in some
>>>>>> order...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first match found would be deployed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that summarize your request correctly... or at least
>>>>>> closely?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> -Arun
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would be a bit concerned about what would happen if there was
>>>>>> a file named hello (with no extension)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vbk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arun Gupta wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An application is deployed as:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> asadmin deploy hello.war or
>>>>>>> asadmin deploy hello.ear or
>>>>>>> asadmin deploydir hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and all 3 deployments are undeployed as
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> asadmin undeploy hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now the question ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can the deployment be simplified by creating precedence rules
>>>>>>> and making the extension redundant ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Arun
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
---
Lloyd L Chambers
lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc