vince kraemer wrote:
> You are right. Broken depends on your perspective.
>
> So, the question of, "why did this (the syntax) get changed?" remains
> unanswered.
>
> Can anyone answer that question?
The syntax is changed since we don't want to support two different code
paths since redeploy is essentially the same as "deploy --force=true".
>
> In the case of directory deployed web apps, etc... the user has
> entered the name and the path to deploy the app, right?
>
> The domain.xml has the correct path associated with the name and
> should just use that, if there is no path argument given.
>
> I think the new "correct" syntax is actually asking tools and users to
> reenter data. (I cannot really tell, since I don't see any definitive
> reference for redeploy through the web admin interface)That seems like
> it will make mistakes easier to make... not harder...
How did NB plugin handle this issue in v2? From NB, it should know
the path to the application; why does it need this information from
domain.xml?
>
>
> vbk
>
> PS: I also noticed that Ludo's original question was not answered
> directly... "what is the real syntax for redeploy or a dir deployed
> app?" (which I think is really... what is the real syntax for redeploy
> of a dir deployed app?)
The syntax is the same as v2.
Currently, the supported options for deploy command in v3 (for TP2) are:
"deploy [--name app-name] [--contextroot contextroot] [--virtualservers
virtualserver] [--force true|false] [--precompilejsp true|false]
<archive-file | archive-directory>"
and
"redeploy" = "deploy --force=true"
HTH,
Jane
>
> Jane Young wrote:
>
>> Hi Vince,
>>
>> It's not broken... the syntax has changed for redeploy :-)
>>
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> Vince Kraemer wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like a bad idea to break something that has been working...
>>>
>>> Why did this get changed?
>>>
>>> vbk
>>> Jane Young wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ludo,
>>>>
>>>> The correct syntax for redeply is to use the full path.
>>>> "redeploy" is the same as "deploy --force=true <path>".
>>>>
>>>> Jane
>>>>
>>>> Ludovic Champenois wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> so what is the real syntax for redeploy or a dir deployed app?
>>>>>
>>>>> With TP1, this used to work:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://localhost:8080/__asadmin/redeploy?name=WebApplication18
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the name 'WebApplication18' is known and it's location is
>>>>> known (see the list-application), then this command should work
>>>>> for dir deployed app, no?
>>>>> Should I do instead:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://localhost:8080/__asadmin/redeploy?path=FULLPATH
>>>>> ?
>>>>> Ludo
>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>