jsr345-experts@ejb-spec.java.net

[jsr345-experts] Re: (EJB_SPEC-13) EJB 3.2 Lite Support for Asynchronous

From: Rick Hightower <richardhightower_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:50:45 -0700

Well said. Not sure if the async Servlets is the same beast though. Isn't
that dealing with Comet type stuff?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:

> This, for me, makes it even more important. There is nothing a developer
> hates more than learning 3 ways to do the same thing!
>
> On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:30, Marina Vatkina wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure it'll be straight forward to add support for all managed
> beans - servlets and Web services already define their own approach to an
> asynchronous processing...
> >
> > -marina
> >
> > Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> >> Like Pete I would like to see @Asynchronous in managed beans.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:46, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk<mailto:
> pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to see this too. However I see this only as a first
> >> step and would also like to add this to the list of services to
> >> extract entirely so they can be used in managed beans (similar to
> >> interceptors and our discussions around declarative transactions).
> >>
> >> Pete
> >>
> >> On 27 Sep 2011, at 02:19, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> >>
> >> > This was also voted for by 2 experts. Would anybody else like to
> >> see this change in EJB 3.2?
> >> >
> >> > thanks,
> >> > -marina
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Antonio Goncalves
> >> Software architect and Java Champion
> >>
> >> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <
> http://twitter.com/agoncal> | Blog <
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves> | LinkedIn <
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org>
>
>


-- 
*Rick Hightower*
(415) 968-9037
Profile <http://www.google.com/profiles/RichardHightower>