This, for me, makes it even more important. There is nothing a developer hates more than learning 3 ways to do the same thing!
On 27 Sep 2011, at 18:30, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> I'm not sure it'll be straight forward to add support for all managed beans - servlets and Web services already define their own approach to an asynchronous processing...
>
> -marina
>
> Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>> Like Pete I would like to see @Asynchronous in managed beans.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:46, Pete Muir <pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk <mailto:pmuir_at_bleepbleep.org.uk>> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to see this too. However I see this only as a first
>> step and would also like to add this to the list of services to
>> extract entirely so they can be used in managed beans (similar to
>> interceptors and our discussions around declarative transactions).
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> On 27 Sep 2011, at 02:19, Marina Vatkina wrote:
>>
>> > This was also voted for by 2 experts. Would anybody else like to
>> see this change in EJB 3.2?
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > -marina
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | Blog <http://feeds.feedburner.com/AntonioGoncalves> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org>