Users won't expect a MB to throw EJBTransactionRolledbackException (for
example), but they do expect the EJB to do that.
It also means the EJB exceptions need to be available on the client CP.
(Not that I mind, but I know a lot of people have a different opinion on
this.)
Carlo
On 06/24/2011 11:59 PM, Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Carlo,
>
> Can you please elaborate?
>
> thanks,
> -marina
>
> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>> I'm curious to everybody's vision on exception handling in this light.
>>
>> I like the strict format of EJB exception handling, but this does
>> expose EJBException and friends to the client.
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> On 06/18/2011 02:27 AM, Reza Rahman wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I guess this is a question more for Marina and/or Pete as well as
>>> for all of us collectively to ponder (and maybe the Java EE EG). As
>>> I mentioned in my introductory email, there are a number of EJB-ish
>>> features that I personally believe is a better fit for the CDI 1.1
>>> and/or JMS 2 specifications. Here is a partial list of such features:
>>>
>>> * Introducing the @TransactionScoped and @ThreadScoped CDI scopes
>>> geared towards using back-end resources in a thread-safe manner in
>>> plain managed beans.
>>> * Introducing the @PoolScoped CDI scope as a way of providing the
>>> equivalent of stateless session beans in plain managed beans.
>>> Alternatively or in addition to, a @MaxActive annotation could be
>>> introduced.
>>> * Re-factoring Message Driven Beans to enable message receivers in
>>> plain managed beans via CDI observers.
>>> * Standardizing some common JMS activation properties as direct
>>> message listener attributes.
>>>
>>> Now, a lot of this hinges on successfully decoupling EJB
>>> transactions from the component model. If we are reasonably
>>> confident that this will happen and agree that these features really
>>> belong outside the EJB specification, I'd like to bring them up ASAP
>>> in the CDI 1.1 and/or JMS 2 EGs. I thought it's only fair to check
>>> here first before I went down that path too far...
>>>
>>> What do we think?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reza
>>