My apologies Rama. I should have re-checked the CVS emails. You
certainly did not make that change. It was actually Jitu who made the
change I had in mind (to ClientExecutor.java).
sorry for the confusion,
Ken
Rama Pulavarthi wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> I am not sure if i put any code to exclude some methods.
> Which file has the suspected change?
>
> thanks,
> Rama Pulavarthi
>
> Ken Hofsass wrote:
>
>> I was thinking, it might be an issue with one of the fixes that Rama
>> put in to exclude certain methods from being included in the
>> namespace. Maybe not, but I was thinking of looking there to
>> confirm. -- Ken
>>
>> Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>>
>>> Ken Hofsass wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kohsuke,
>>>>
>>>> The wsrm/dispatch test works with the previous revision of
>>>> BSH/harness jars (Bhakti's machine, my machine) but fails
>>>> consisitently with the new ones (my machine, Hudson).
>>>>
>>>> It could be our internal changes or could be the new BSH that was
>>>> integrated. Could you take a look at the test output, see if
>>>> anything sticks out? If not, I'll debug into things further.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK. I'll take a look.
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_ws-test-harness.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_ws-test-harness.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_ws-test-harness.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_ws-test-harness.dev.java.net
>