If I am not wrong, 4.1 didn't have ajax features, autocomplete and so on...
it's a little bit too old for my requirements
And honestly I think that developers who trust a big company like Sun,
deserve at least the minimum support to make their project live for a little
bit more than a couple of months.
fedevela wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been using woodstock 4.1 without problems on FF2 and FF3 and IE.
>
> Perhaps it would help you to downgrade a further step down?
>
> That is of course if the feature set of 4.1 is sufficient.
>
> Regards,
>
> Federico Vela
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> to whom they are addressed. Unless you have express written permission
> from PaySett Corporation you are not allowed to disseminate, distribute
> or copy this e-mail outside of the intended organization. If you are not
> the intended recipient/organization you are notified that disclosing,
> copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents
> of this information is strictly prohibited.
>
>
> Brett Bergquist wrote:
>> I totally agree. I have a product in production and I can now only
>> support FF2 and am getting flack about when FF3 will be supported.
>> Changing to Icefaces is a many month process for me.
>>
>> autozoom wrote:
>>> Maybe I am not reading the right forums or mailing lists, but I would
>>> really
>>> like to know the progress about deploying the final woodstock 4.2
>>> release
>>> with fixes for FF3.
>>> Downgrading from 4.3 to 4.2 I have also found a big issue about
>>> autocomplete
>>> fields in 4.2, which overlaps the text field and doesn't react to key
>>> presses at times.
>>>
>>> Are there dates we can rely on? No news is bad news in this case.
>>>
>>> I am also studying the icefaces framework; it's quite good, but it
>>> lacks a
>>> something that I use very much in woodstock, that is the possibility to
>>> $(id).refresh() just the components I want and not the entire page.
>>>
>>> This is a big issue in my opinion, refer to woodstock to icefaces
>>> migration
>>> forum on icefaces site to read about it.
>>>
>>> I really hope some progress will be achieved soon
>>>
>>> thanks Mauro
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/final-woodstock-4.2-release--tp21541085p21541085.html
>>>
>>> Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at
>>> Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/final-woodstock-4.2-release--tp21541085p21568130.html
Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.