users@woodstock.java.net

Re: Woodstock update

From: autozoom <cioni_mauro_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 06:06:06 -0800 (PST)

yes we can and maybe we'll be forced to, but what about the visual approach
to developing web inteface?
It is (was...) the real point of strength of Woodstock components and
Netbeans I think


Paolo Proni wrote:
>
> Maybe we can give a look at RichFaces by RedHat...
>> I think at least Sun now owes us a fast update on what we are going to do
>> with our production deployments based upon Woodstock.
>> Will there continue to be a visuall web framework for Netbeans? Do we
>> need
>> to switch to Icefaces, Quipukit, Infragistics or some other framework?
>>
>> We cannot wait another 2 months, really!
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>
>

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Woodstock-update-tp20317701p20361654.html
Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.