I'm assuming you're using the JSP tags, but what wiki are you looking
at? Did you define the ThemeServlet in your web.xml? I ask because the
path to the bootstrap.js file should be appended with your app context.
Note that Woodstock 4.3 does not depend on dojo-0.4.3-ajax.jar or
prototype*.jar.
Dan
Vijaishanker Balaramiah wrote:
>
> Thanks, Dan, it looks like
> "/theme/woodstock4_3_m1/suntheme/javascript/bootstrap.js" is returning
> a 404 HTTP status, "The requested resource () is not available.".
> Could it be due to some missing jars? i am using 4.3 now and I tried
> to deploy woodstock along with my webapp,as explained in the wiki, but
> I am unable to find certain jar files like the dojo-0.4.3-ajax.jar and
> the prototype*.jar in the 4.3 components distribution. I managed to
> get the other required jars from the 4.3 examples. I had also included
> the head tags in my page.
>
> thanks,
>
> vijai
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Dan.Labrecque_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Dan.Labrecque_at_Sun.COM]
> *Sent:* 27 May 2008 18:15
> *To:* users_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: Dojo is not defined error on firefox
>
>
>
> What do you mean by "using Woodstock 4.1.1 components directly"? Are
> you using the private JavaScript APIs or the JSP tags? Are you using
> the Woodstock head or themeLinks tags? Either one of these tags should
> set up the page to include necessary resources.
>
> Vijaishanker Balaramiah wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am using Woodstock 4.1.1 components directly in my webapp
> deployed on Sun App Server 9.1. I am generating a woodstock table
> component, wherein the javascript tags are generated for the table but
> on firefox error console I get a "dojo is not defined" error message
> and hence, no table is generated :( . I double-checked the
> javascript.properties and it points to the respective dojo libraries
> in /META-INF. I tried previously with Woodstock 4.3 and there I got a
> "webui is not defined". Could someone help me in what could have
> possibly gone wrong.
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
> vijai
>
>
>