users@woodstock.java.net

Re: What about html renderer in woodstock 4.1?

From: matroska <matroska_at_libero.it>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:24:46 -0800 (PST)

Winston Prakash wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What other HTML renderer other than designtime renderers?
>
Downloading woodstock cvs you can find html renderer in
woodstock/webui/src/runtime/com/sun/webui/jsf/renderkit/html

and, in addiction, ajax and widget renderer.




> Actually I created the jar to test the performance between HTML
> rendering and Client side rendering.
> I did not find too much performance degradation.
>
> Apart from slight performance problem, Client side rendering is what
> you need to write next gen web 2.0
> application.
>

Performance aren't so bad in a modern pc but it's bad the way the page
loads. On a low end pc like thin clients (that are used by our customers)
you can see the empty pages that gradually fill themselves after the page
downloading time. For example, paginating a table of 800 rows is awfully
slow. There are now two waiting times:
-the download of the page and the needed resources.
-the javascript rendering of components.
I don't understand why ajaxifing process implies client side rendering. I
used ajax with server-side renderer and many implementations like jboss
richfaces does it (using a servlet filter or an ajax servlet).

Thanks.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-about-html-renderer-in-woodstock-4.1--tf4935484.html#a14153973
Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.