users@woodstock.java.net

Re: Heads up: Dojo .9

From: Dan Labrecque <Dan.Labrecque_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:36:48 -0400

No, we don't use Dojo for Ajax. We use JSF-Extensions for Ajax
functionality. Dojo is used for its template support, event system, etc.

Jason Suplizio wrote:
> Are the components only dependent on dojo to perform the Ajax operations?
>
> On 9/27/07, *Dan Labrecque* < Dan.Labrecque_at_sun.com
> <mailto:Dan.Labrecque_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>
> There seems to be some expectation that Dojo .9 would be
> introduced for
> build #13 (September 28th). Although that's what I was shooting
> for, we
> have to defer this for the following build. I'm still testing, but
> seeing significant improvement in download speeds. This
> improvement is
> mainly due to the reduced number of JavaScript requests made by Dojo.
> However, we plan to increase performance even further by reducing the
> number of requests for our own JavaScript. There is also some image
> mapping in the works to reduce the number of themed image requests.
>
> Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Ganhdi
>
> "Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is
> not a crime. "
> Earnest Hemingway