Dan,
When is next milestone release ? Is this 2 week builds ?
Padraig.
----- Original Message ----
From: Dan Labrecque <Dan.Labrecque@Sun.COM>
To: users@woodstock.dev.java.net
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:50:39 PM
Subject: Re: dojo and performance
Woodstock also uses "ShrinkSafe" to compress JavaScript files. However,
the bottle neck (in part) is the number of requests made by Dojo. I'm
in the process of porting Woodstock to Dojo .9, which will greatly
increase performance by seconds. After that, we plan to reduce the
number of requests made by Woodstock itself to increase performance
even further. We may have this implemented for the next milestone build
-- stay tuned.
Dan
John Yeary wrote:
I have also found this to be the case. I have improved the
performance slightly by using Dojo ShrinkSafe to compress all of the
Javascript in the jar files.
John
On 9/20/07,
Roger Keays <roger.keays@ninthavenue.com.au>
wrote:
Hi
All,
I've recently been experimenting with the woodstock components which
look very good (particularly the data table). Unfortunately, in the most
basic of use cases it takes about 3 seconds to render an empty table in
the browser. Is there any way to get the render performance of the
woodstock components on par with components using regular markup?
It would seem that dojo is the bottleneck here, but I've never done
anything with that library before.
Cheers,
Roger
--
------------------------------------
Ninth Avenue Software
p: +61 7 3137 1351 (UTC +10)
f: +61 7 3102 9141
w:
http://www.ninthavenue.com.au
e: info@ninthavenue.com.au
------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@woodstock.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@woodstock.dev.java.net
--
John Yeary
--
"If I have seen further, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of
giants..." Sir Isaac Newton