Woodstock also uses "ShrinkSafe" to compress JavaScript files. However,
the bottle neck (in part) is the number of requests made by Dojo. I'm in
the process of porting Woodstock to Dojo .9, which will greatly increase
performance by seconds. After that, we plan to reduce the number of
requests made by Woodstock itself to increase performance even further.
We may have this implemented for the next milestone build -- stay tuned.
Dan
John Yeary wrote:
> I have also found this to be the case. I have improved the performance
> slightly by using Dojo ShrinkSafe to compress all of the Javascript in
> the jar files.
>
> John
>
> On 9/20/07, * Roger Keays* <roger.keays_at_ninthavenue.com.au
> <mailto:roger.keays_at_ninthavenue.com.au>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've recently been experimenting with the woodstock components which
> look very good (particularly the data table). Unfortunately, in
> the most
> basic of use cases it takes about 3 seconds to render an empty
> table in
> the browser. Is there any way to get the render performance of the
> woodstock components on par with components using regular markup?
>
> It would seem that dojo is the bottleneck here, but I've never done
> anything with that library before.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Roger
>
> --
> ------------------------------------
> Ninth Avenue Software
> p: +61 7 3137 1351 (UTC +10)
> f: +61 7 3102 9141
> w: http://www.ninthavenue.com.au
> e: info_at_ninthavenue.com.au <mailto:info_at_ninthavenue.com.au>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> <mailto:users-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
>
> --
> John Yeary
> --
> "If I have seen further, it is because I have stood on the shoulders
> of giants..." Sir Isaac Newton