FYI, I have been doing some testing with Firefox 2.0.0.12. In my test
case, I used a 200 row table with 3 columns -- the first column contains
checkboxes. For the 4.0 release, this example takes and average of 4.4
seconds to load. However, in the 4.1.1 release, the same example only
takes 3.7 seconds to load. Looking at the upcoming 4.2 m3 release, this
example loads in 2.8 seconds. And an extremely large 1000 row table
still only took 8 seconds -- also with 4.2 m3.
That said, I don't doubt the performance issues with the 4.1 release.
(The example took 11.5 seconds to load in 4.1.) However, it does appear
that things are getting better. I hope to add more performance
improvements in the next milestones as well. Sorry I cannot do more...
Dan
b.behrens_at_avm.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a fresh, clean install of NB 6.0.1 which ships with Woodstock 4.1.1
> as far as I understood.
> You are right, there is a performance gain compared to Woodstock 4.1. Silly
> thing, I thought I already updated via plugin-update.
> Alas, comparing with 4.0 the perfomance is not acceptable!
>
> Again a large table (150 rows *12 col) is rendered and shown in less than 2
> seconds with Woodstock 4.0.
> The table contains a lot of calculated properties like background-colors
> and links.
>
> With Woodstock 4.1.1 the same table needs:
> 13 seconds in FireFox 2.0.0.12
> 23 seconds in Internet Explorer 7
> And is never(!) shown in Opera 9.26
> Of course these times may vary depending on the client-hardware.
>
> So you may see, we simply can't use Woodstock 4.1.1 without the users
> killing us... ;)
>
> I may repeat my initial question:
> Is there any way to use Woodstock 4.0.x in Netbeans 6.0.x?
> If so, how could we achieve that?
> Or is there any way to switch back to server-side rendering?
> The only other alternative for us is staying with NB 5.5.1. Which would be
> a bad alternative as well...
>
> Thanks!
> Bjoern
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> |-------------+------------------------>
> | | |
> | | Dan Labrecque |
> | | <Dan.Labrecque_at_Sun.COM>|
> | | Gesendet von: |
> | | Dan.Labrecque_at_Sun.COM |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | 19.02.2008 18:39 |
> |-------------+------------------------>
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | An: |
> | |
> | dev_at_woodstock.dev.java.net |
> | |
> | Kopie: |
> | |
> | b.behrens_at_avm.de |
> | |
> | Thema: |
> | |
> | Re: [Fwd: Woodstock 4.0 with NetBeans 6?] |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> This has been addressed in the 4.1.1 release.
>
> https://woodstock.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectForumMessageView?messageID=22285&forumID=2879
>
>
> Dan
>
> Winston Prakash wrote:
> Forwarding to woodstock dev
>
> - Winston
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> Subject: Woodstock 4.0 with NetBeans 6?
>
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:42:49 -0800
> (PST)
>
> From: b.behrens <b.behrens_at_avm.de>
>
> Reply-To: users_at_visualweb.netbeans.org
>
> To: users_at_visualweb.netbeans.org
>
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> We have big problems with the perfomance of the Woodstock 4.1
> table-component.
>
> As I understood Woodstock 4.1 switched from server-side to
> client-side
> rendering which seems to be the reason for that.
>
>
>
> The performance drop is significant:
>
> A page with a large table (12 columns * 150 rows) is rendered and
> shown in
> about 2 seconds with Woodstock 4.0. The same page needs 30+ seconds
> with
> Woodstock 4.1.
>
> Shorter tables with about 20 rows are rendered and shown almost
> instantly
> with Woodstock 4.0 and need about 6-10 seconds with Woodstock 4.1.
>
> Tests with 4.2 build 2 showed no significant changes in performance
> for us.
>
> So, from our point of view Woodstock 4.1 (and higher) is unusable for
> us,
> because the application is already in production and the users would
> not
> accept such a big degression in performance...
>
>
>
> Is there any way to use Woodstock 4.0 in NetBeans 6?
> Or switch back to server-side rendering?
> If not, we have to stay with 5.5.1.
>
> We would hate to do so ;)
>
>
>
> Any hint would be appreciated, thanks!
>
> Bjoern
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Woodstock-4.0-with-NetBeans-6--tp15542517p15542517.html
>
> Sent from the Visual Web - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_visualweb.netbeans.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_visualweb.netbeans.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>
>