So we want to freeze the 4.1.1 release either before, or just after,
Thanksgiving. I know the performance fix for 888 is ready to go back,
but can the Dojo 1.0 work be done in the next week? I would like to
give QA a real good look at it before we freeze.
Thanks,
D
Dan Labrecque wrote:
> I wanted to add Dojo 1.0 for the final release, but was shot down
> because the code was in high resistance mode. (It literally became
> available only days before our final release.) Unfortunately, I don't
> believe Woodstock 4.1 can be compatible with Dojo 1.0 without a few
> core changes. For example, Dojo changed the widget constructor
> signature, yet again. Similarly, they changed a couple JavaScript file
> names, so some dojo.require statements will no longer work properly.
> Moving from Dojo .4 to .9 was a nightmare for us, but this won't be
> nearly as bad -- doesn't help you any, though.
>
> That said, there are plans to create a Woodstock 4.1.1 release, due
> around Dec 3rd. This should include Dojo 1.0 along with some
> performance enhancements and more a11y support.
>
> Dan
>
> Steven Bell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like Dojo 1.0 just came out. The porting guide lists a few
>> things that break from 0.9. I was going to drop it in locally and
>> see if anything broke, or anything got better, but it looks like they
>> don't have a packaged jar(s) I can just drop in (not sure if you guys
>> do your own build).
>>
>> It looks like there has been a significant amount of work between 0.9
>> and 1.0. Just curious what the impact could be to the woodstock
>> library if anybody knows off-hand.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Steven Bell
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>