dev@woodstock.java.net

Re: Woodstock performance question

From: John Yeary <johnyeary_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:59:39 -0400

I found a performance gain when I opened the jar files and replaced the
existing uncompressed js files with compressed ones using Dojo Shrinksafe (
http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/shrinksafe/). It is a little work, but in my
case worth the 1-2 second gain in efficiency.

John

On 9/7/07, Mary Lautman <Mary.Lautman_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
>
> They are targetted for 4.1.
>
> Steven Bell wrote:
>
> > All great information, thanks guys. Just one last question and then I
> > think I can stop bothering you.
> >
> > I took a look at bugs 730-733, and those look to be exactly the
> > problem. The bugs have a target milestone of 'milestone 1', and a
> > Version of 4.1. Does this mean they are targeted to be fixed before
> > the end of the month (the September 28th build 13, before entering the
> > 'high resistance mode'), or will they be after 4.1?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>


-- 
John Yeary
--
"If I have seen further, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of
giants..."  Sir Isaac Newton