dev@woodstock.java.net

Re: Woodstock performance question

From: Steven Bell <bell.steven_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:35:29 -0700

That's encouraging. Is there any idea of a timeline (4.1 maybe) for these
changes? Is this a dojo 0.4.3 issue that would require a move to dojo
0.9(not a simple jar change from what I understand)? Probably just
easier if I
ask if you know what the problem is, and/or what a fix would entail.

It'd even be nice if you could point us in the right direction of a fix, we
might be able to tackle it on our end and send changes back your way (maybe,
might take some convincing to get dev resources for that).

On 9/6/07, richard ratta <Richard.Ratta_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> We are working on this issue and trying to improve the file download
> situation.
>
> -rick
>
> Steven Bell wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been doing evaluations of 3rd party component libraries for a few
> > weeks now, and Woodstock is one that my group really likes.
> >
> > I do have a question on performance though. Specifically with the
> > table, but I'm guessing we'd see this as we got into other components,
> > they seem to be sluggish. A little bit of detective work on my end
> > points the finger at getting all the js files.
> >
> > On a fairly basic table, 20-30 items loaded from an in memory list,
> > sorting takes about three seconds from click to final render. Most if
> > this time is spend on just over 40 separate GET calls to get the
> > various js files at about 30-45ms each (local network, server is a
> > pretty new solaris 10 box, should be more than enough horse power).
> >
> > Is there any way to preload/cache/inline these js files? I thought IE
> > and Firefox would cache the js after the first load, but it looks like
> > the dojo library is actually making the calls.
> >
> > This is a pretty big deal in terms of company adoption of Woodstock.
> > Any ideas would be appreciated.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steven Bell
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_woodstock.dev.java.net
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Steven Bell