On 2009 Jan 28, at 05:38, Avi Flax wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:49, Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_sun.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 22, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Avi Flax wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Marc Hadley wrote:
>>>
>>> A bit of both. I think the suggested refactoring makes sense and
>>> I've
>>>> added an issue to track this:
>>>>
>>>> https://wadl.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13
>>>>
>>>
>>> Great issue! Looking forward to this. When might we expect this
>>> revision to be released?
>>>
>>> I'm a little snowed under presently but I hope to get to it in the
>> not-too-distant future.
>>
>
> Marc, I'd love to see this revision to the WADL spec. We use WADL
> every day
> in my org and this improvement would really help my people connect
> to it
> even more. Any chance we might see this sometime soon?
>
> If I can help out, by submitting patches to the schemas or the spec,
> I'd be
> happy to do so. Not sure I'll be able to deal with TeX, but I'm
> willing to
> give it a shot!
Likewise, I'd be happy to help out if I can (I sent the original query
that resulted in this issue).
What's involved? Is it just spec and documentation adjustments? I
suppose the wadl2java tool have to be adjusted at the same time.
Best wishes,
Norman
--
Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk
Dept Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester