users@wadl.java.net

Re: WADL status vs representation

From: Avi Flax <avif_at_arc90.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:38:04 -0500

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:49, Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_sun.com> wrote:

> On Jul 22, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Avi Flax wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Marc Hadley wrote:
>>
>> A bit of both. I think the suggested refactoring makes sense and I've
>>> added an issue to track this:
>>>
>>> https://wadl.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=13
>>>
>>
>> Great issue! Looking forward to this. When might we expect this
>> revision to be released?
>>
>> I'm a little snowed under presently but I hope to get to it in the
> not-too-distant future.
>

Marc, I'd love to see this revision to the WADL spec. We use WADL every day
in my org and this improvement would really help my people connect to it
even more. Any chance we might see this sometime soon?

If I can help out, by submitting patches to the schemas or the spec, I'd be
happy to do so. Not sure I'll be able to deal with TeX, but I'm willing to
give it a shot!

Thanks!

-- 
Avi Flax » Lead Technologist » Partner » Arc90 » http://arc90.com