Re: Package names

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:47:52 -0400

It would be good if people already using the plug-ins don't have to
go back and edit their build because of class name changes, e.g. the ant task. If folks really want
to move to a new package then we could keep the old class and simply
defer to the renamed class for backwards compatibility.


On Oct 24, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Wilfred Springer wrote:

> Farrukh,
> I noticed that you also changed the names of the packages. (That
> is, in
> wadl2java; it did prevent me from building the latest version, by
> the way
> ;-) Just fixed that a minute ago.)
> I'm ok with changing it in anything we like, but I don't think this is
> actually *required* for the integration. I'd prefer to move to an
> integrated build ASAP, and then start working on the head to make
> changes
> like these. Changing all of this too might make merging the two
> code bases
> harder.
> Any comments?
> From my perspective, I think we are done when:
> * We are able to generate the same + more artifacts that the build was
> producing before.
> * Make sure everything can be built automatically using the CI
> solution that
> we are going to use
> (+ ideally, have some tests.)
> Do I miss anything?
> Wilfred

Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.