Hi Mark,
Yes, I would have to agree. It doesn't seem likely we can get agreement before 12/31 JTA1.2 timeframe and so this will need to be deferred.
Regards,
Paul
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:06 AM, Mark Little wrote:
> Whilst I think this is an important thing to have (as you know, we've had it in Arjuna since 1986), I'm not convinced that there is sufficient agreement on the *how* to get it done in a timeframe that makes sense for EE7. However, can you remind me of the deadlines that are in place for JTA 1.2? (I know the EE7 ones.)
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 18 Oct 2012, at 22:59, Paul Parkinson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> During the JTA 1.2 BoF at JavaOne a couple weeks back it was made clear that http://java.net/jira/browse/JTA_SPEC-4 "support explicit ordering of commits for XAResources enlisted in a transaction" is something that is highly desirable for JTA 1.2.
>>
>> Although I feel we do have time to get this in, we really need to make progress on reaching a consensus as far as the approach and details and thus this email to get things going.
>>
>> Please read the JIRA entry and provide your opinions as soon as possible if you would.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Paul
>
> ---
> Mark Little
> mlittle_at_redhat.com
>
> JBoss, by Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).
>
>
>
>