On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Manger, James H wrote:
> Paul,
>
> > (%20.%20.) rather than ( . .)
> [I assume you meant regex ‘.’ instead of wildcard ‘?’]
>
Yes!
> Yes. I think that is a reasonable cost. If you want to specify a
> regex you have to take care of encoding yourself. In practice it is
> unlikely to be much of an issue as people will use character
> classes that accept lots, eg [^/;].
I agree.
Paul.