On May 15, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>
> Thanks for spending the time on it and all the feedback...
> Are you planning to address that issue with (.+)? too as part of
> this update (though it's a bit orthogonal to the algorithm itself
> but to do with the @Path's value conversion procedure) ?
>
No, that will be a separate update. I'll first draft a note to the
expert group alias to gather any additional feedback on that one.
Marc.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
> To: <users_at_jsr311.dev.java.net>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Selecting between method candidates
>
>
> Paul and I discussed this at length this morning and I'm going to try
> to rewrite the algorithm along the lines you suggest. The rewrite
> won't actually affect the algorithms results but will hopefully be
> clearer. Its worth pointing out that implementations aren't required
> to implement resource matching using the algorithm as described,
> rather they are required to produce results that are the same - I'll
> add an explicit note of this to the specification.
>
>> S.B : sure, it makes sense.
>
> Marc.
>
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4,
> Ireland
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>
---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.