dev@jsr311.java.net

Re: JSR311: Java mime type

From: Dhanji R. Prasanna <dhanji_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:54:25 -0700

Seems to me that application/war+java fulfills that case, anyway.

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:11 AM, <larry.cable_at_oracle.com> wrote:

> may I ask why?
>
> On 5/22/2009 4:57 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
>
> Im OK with application/*+java but I'd be opposed to application/war, ear,
> etc.
> Dhanji R. Prasanna.
> Google, Inc
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Bill Burke <bburke_at_redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't see any Java mime types registered with Iana. Maybe this is
>>>> something we should think about, define in JAX-RS, and register with Iana?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, JAX-RS would be a reasonable place to specify any such media type
>>> declarations.
>>>
>>>
>>> First thoughts are something like:
>>>>
>>>> application/*+java;version=x
>>>>
>>>>
>>> For Java source, classes, jars, wars, web start stuff?
>>>
>>> Does it make sense for individual classes?
>>>
>>>
>> My though would be for serialized objects. I know there is one defined
>> somewhere in Java SE javadocs:
>>
>> application/x-java-serialized-object
>>
>> But, I was hoping for the *+ and version property as well (and have it
>> registered with IANA.
>>
>> I guess we could define a application/war, application/ear,
>> application/jar, etc... too
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities,
> that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally
> privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have
> received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and
> then delete it.
>
>