may I ask why?
On 5/22/2009 4:57 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
> Im OK with application/*+java but I'd be opposed to application/war,
> ear, etc.
>
> Dhanji R. Prasanna.
> Google, Inc
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Bill Burke <bburke_at_redhat.com
> <mailto:bburke_at_redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
>
> On May 22, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> I didn't see any Java mime types registered with Iana.
> Maybe this is something we should think about, define in
> JAX-RS, and register with Iana?
>
>
> Yes, JAX-RS would be a reasonable place to specify any such
> media type declarations.
>
>
> First thoughts are something like:
>
> application/*+java;version=x
>
>
> For Java source, classes, jars, wars, web start stuff?
>
> Does it make sense for individual classes?
>
>
> My though would be for serialized objects. I know there is one
> defined somewhere in Java SE javadocs:
>
> application/x-java-serialized-object
>
> But, I was hoping for the *+ and version property as well (and
> have it registered with IANA.
>
> I guess we could define a application/war, application/ear,
> application/jar, etc... too
>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> <mailto:dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net>
>
>
>
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the
> intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
> immediately return this by email and then delete it.