dev@jsr311.java.net

Re: JSR311: Re: ContextResolver removal

From: Marcel Thibault <mthibault_at_novell.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:13:03 -0600

> Makes sense that you might want to have different JAXBContext for > the same type and different mime format. (A Jettison enabled/ > configured JAXBContext for JSON for example). >

Sounds like an interesting idea.

+1

Marcel...

>>> Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM> 06/10/08 2:11 PM >>>
On Jun 10, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>> One thing we could consider is to make the JAXBContext usage more
>>> obvious.
>> I have also to say that I need time to understand what the
>> ContextResolver is for. You could add some javadoc, that an example
>> use is for JAXBContext.
>
> Question: Is the container supposed to search for and use
> @ProduceMime/_at_ConsumeMime annotations on a ContextResolver?
>
Not currently.

> Makes sense that you might want to have different JAXBContext for
> the same type and different mime format. (A Jettison enabled/
> configured JAXBContext for JSON for example).
>
Sounds like an interesting idea.

Marc.

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jsr311.dev.java.net