Hello Marc,
>>> It would bother me if we added new targets but didn't define what
>>> should happen if a developer uses those targets. E.g. if we added
>>> FIELD as a target for @PathParam then I think we'd have to require
>>> implementations to support that annotation on resource class fields.
>>> That's fine for the per-request resource life cycle but what about
>>> singleton resources...
>> @*Param on fields could be used the same as @Context.
> Injecting a thread-local proxy won't work for primitive types.
??
I meant that resource class fields could be annotated with @*Param and
injected as @Context annotated fields on resource classes fields.
regards
Stephan