Re: JSR311: some comments

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:15:53 -0700

Good catch, the spec needs to be updated - I'll add it to my to-do list.

BTW, I'm on the road this week so updates and responses will be a bit
slower than usual.


On Mar 18, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Bill Burke wrote:

> Yes, please don't remove this and update the spec.
> I want:
> @PathParam("something") PathSegment segment
> So that i can get matrix params for a specific path segment easily.
> Stephan Koops wrote:
>> Hello Marc,
>> there is an inconsistency between javadoc and the spec: @PathParam
>> is (javadoc) allowed also on a PathSegment. This is missing in the
>> spec (sect "Parameters" = 3.2.2 in current state of SVN).
>> In this case the value of @PathParam makes no sense IMO, or do I
>> miss something? Than it could be useful to allow @PathParam without
>> any value. Another possibility is to use @Context instead of
>> @PathParam on a PathSegment parameter.
>> Stephan
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.